Skip to content
Vol. 1 · Weekly editionWeekly · in your inbox
inklaretaal
Vol. 1 · No. 202638

Finance edition

in·klare·taal
Edition 202638 · Monday 14 September 2026 · Clarity since 2026

Dutch decision-makers are drawing a hard line for AI that pays on its own, the leaders of OpenAI and Anthropic want to hit the brakes themselves, and Exact is adding a financial AI agent to its package.

What changes for you

Dutch organisations: AI must not pay on its own above 10,000 euros

Six in ten decision-makers want a set amount limit for AI that carries out financial actions on its own.

IT consultancy Dynamic People asked 317 IT and business decision-makers at medium and large Dutch organisations where the line is for AI that acts on its own. 61 percent think AI should never decide alone on financial actions above a certain amount. The limit named most often is 10,000 euros (29 percent), followed by 50,000 euros (22 percent). Another 18 percent think AI should never make a financial decision on its own at all. People also want to keep control over supplier contracts (53 percent), dismissals (51 percent) and salaries (45 percent). The sharpest figure comes further on: at organisations where AI already does act on its own, 79 percent see a human step in only after damage has already occurred. That is exactly what your job is for: a booking or payment that can no longer be undone. It is not a law, but it is a useful figure to bring to the table when management asks whether the AI can not just do something itself. An AI agent really acts: it gets rights in your accounting or payment system. The question then is up to what amount it may act. You arrange that in the rights themselves and in the approval step. Many organisations build in that step only afterwards, so it no longer works as a brake. A high limit is tempting because every exception costs time, but look instead at what one mistake costs and how fast you discover it. Set the limit low and raise it only once the check beforehand is proven to work.

Source

Background for subscribers
What this means for you
Set your own amount limit before AI does it for you

This edition shows it is no longer about whether AI may act on its own in finance, but up to what amount. Six in ten decision-makers want a hard limit, and Exact is already building AI into your own accounting package. Take a critical look at the rights your AI tools already have, and at who checks the outcome before it goes out the door.

Altman, Amodei and Musk want to hit the brakes themselves, the stock market gets spooked

Sam Altman of OpenAI joined Anthropic boss Dario Amodei and Elon Musk this weekend in a call to deliberately slow down the development of advanced AI, so that people keep control. Altman wrote that no competitive pressure can justify recklessness. He warned about losing control to AI systems and about power concentrating in one company or person. Amodei came with a three-step plan, including independent overseers with 'employee-like access' at major AI labs. The market reacted immediately: SoftBank lost 13 percent in Tokyo, Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix dropped more than 4 percent in Seoul. The value of such companies depends on expected demand for computing power for AI. Building more slowly means fewer chips and later revenue. So the share prices are not pricing in a safety judgement, but a shifted timeline. For your work, what matters most is what a slower timeline does to your planning: a supplier may deliver features later than promised. These are not laws or policy, so take them as a signal, not a certainty. This week, when discussing an AI investment, ask about the delivery date, not what is on the roadmap.

Source

Background for subscribers

This is a taster.

Subscribers read the whole Finance edition: every story, each with its background in plain language.

Subscribe →

Not ready for that? Read the free letter first →

inklaretaal

AI and tech, made simple.

This is the Finance edition. Subscribers get the background to every story, in plain language.
Subscribe
inklaretaal · Amsterdam · © 2026