Education edition
From 1 October, Word gains an uninvited AI helper, GDPR still says no to pupil names in ChatGPT, and Anthropic's boss is asking his own industry to hit the brakes.
From 1 October, ChatGPT just sits in your Word, unless your admin steps in
ChatGPT for Word switches on by default in business workspaces, so that sidebar shows up whether anyone asked for it or not.
From 1 October 2026, OpenAI turns ChatGPT for Word on by default in ChatGPT Business workspaces. In the Word sidebar, you'll be able to draft a text, summarise a document, or revise a piece of writing. The key word is 'default': nobody has to switch it on. If your school has this kind of workspace, the feature is simply there, even for colleagues who never asked for it. Admins can turn off access through the admin console, but they have to do that themselves, before 1 October. For you, this means: teaching material, a report comment, or a letter to parents can soon be drafted straight from Word, without switching to a browser. That saves time. But something shifts too: a text you always started yourself now starts for you. Finding out if this applies to your school is step one. This kind of sidebar works differently from ChatGPT in your browser: the AI reads along with the document open on your screen. So whatever is in that document goes along when you ask for a summary. If it contains a pupil's name, a grade list, or notes from a conversation, that information goes to an outside service. With ChatGPT in a separate window, you consciously paste something in; here, you only have to forget that the document is open. The line stays the same, but it gets easier to cross without noticing. A school may only let an outside service process pupil data if there's a data processing agreement, a contract stating what the supplier is allowed to do with the data. Turning a feature on by default doesn't arrange that contract. If your admin switches the feature off for everyone, you lose the time saving too. The best outcome isn't 'on' or 'off', but 'on, with clear agreements about which documents you have open'. Ask your IT admin this week whether you have this kind of workspace and what happens on 1 October.
Background for subscribersFrom 1 October, ChatGPT shows up in Word automatically if your school has a ChatGPT Business workspace. Handy, but the document you have open goes along when you ask something: so no pupil names or grade lists on screen while you use the sidebar. That same line applies to every AI tool: anonymise before pasting anything in, even for a quick question. If your school uses ChatGPT Edu with custom-built GPTs, check whether your practice bots have already moved to the new system, because the old one disappears on 11 December. And for any tool allowed to act on its own, ask who approved that and who's keeping an eye on it.
GDPR line stays firm: no pupil names in ChatGPT or Claude
A practical guide for teachers spells out the line once more. Pupils' personal data, such as name, national ID number, results, or a description of behaviour, may not go into an outside AI service without a data processing agreement. ChatGPT, Claude, and other public AI tools don't currently meet Dutch requirements for pupil data. The advice is simple: anonymise. Write 'a pupil in year 7' instead of a name. Take out grades and specific details, or make them general. Do this before pasting anything into an AI tool, even for a quick question between two lessons. A data processing agreement is a contract between your school and the supplier. It states what the supplier may do with the data, how long they keep it, and whether they use it to train their model. Without that contract, legally speaking, it's the school giving away the data, not the teacher. That's why this calls for school-wide agreements, not just good intentions from individual teachers. Anonymising sounds easy, but you can give things away faster than you think. A sentence like 'the only pupil in my year 10 class born in Romania' contains no name and is still identifiable. The same goes for a dyslexia statement or a one-off incident. So don't just ask whether the name is gone, ask whether someone who knows the class could pick the pupil out. If they could, it doesn't belong in a public tool.
Background for subscribersThis is a taster.
Subscribers read the whole Education edition: every story, each with its background in plain language.
Subscribe →Not ready for that? Read the free letter first →
AI and tech, made simple.
This is the Education edition. Subscribers get the background to every story, in plain language.
Subscribe
inklaretaal · Amsterdam · © 2026